How 9/11 will jump start the new world order
From time to time I watch YouTube videos and read books about the new world order, conspiracy theories and other such topics which have prompted me to postulate my own theory about what a world government means for the planet. In these videos and books it is suggested that the president of the United States is nothing but a puppet for the Illuminati, the Bilderberg Group, the Masons, Skulls and Bones, international bankers the military industrial complex, or any one combination of these entities. Although I find it hard to believe that there is one specific group of people who dominate all world politics, military affairs and trade and commerce, I have found evidence of manipulation of the masses through government/corporate controlled media through such projects as Operation Mockingbird. I have never met anyone who has said they work directly for the CIA or any other secret organization for the sole purpose of controlling the media; however I do recognize the word by word reading of government issued press releases on the local television stations. Beyond that I cannot say with 100 percent confidence that the citizens of this planet are being manipulated through the media by any secret organization. I can say however that if this truly is the case than we should take conspiracy theorists a bit more seriously.
Most recent conspiracy theories suggest that 9/11 was planned and produced by the secret organizations which desire to control the world through a global government. I’m not convinced this is true, however I can foresee how such an event could speed up the process of the creation of a mighty international regime.
The new war on terror allowed for the United States to implement policies that not only increased domestic police activity in order to enforce “the laws of the land”, but it also created an indefinite source of military funding for the United States military and other international forces such as NATO. Currently the focus of the war on terror is being placed on Islamic extremists, which for the agenda of creating military cooperation between powerful nations has been quite successful. The United States and NATO are not the only ones active in fighting Islamic extremists. Both China and Russia have had their “problems” with Muslim radicals, and the war on terror is a perfect jump start for cooperation between these powerful countries. And most recently Russia, China and the United States have agreed to take a firm stance against North Korea’s provocative nuclear tests. We must remember that North Korea has helped to deliver nuclear technology and other arms to Islamic extremists across the globe. Piracy in the high seas around Somalia has been another conflict area in which the most powerful countries have come together to fight a common enemy.
Perhaps fighting terrorists, pirates, international crime syndicates and other “bad guys” is not a bad thing, but for the military industrial complex this is the dream they’ve been waiting for. And now that the military industrial complex can receive an indefinite amount of funding to create weapons to fight these “bad guys” they can perpetuate their global influence over political processes which decide who should be dealt with and which laws should be enforced. The war on drugs will inevitably be tied into the war on terror which will provide the police with more power to enforce the streets of the United States and other countries which support this agenda. In New Mexico it is common for the police to shoot and kill suspected gang members with absolutely no recourse. A gang member dies and nobody cares, but when a cop dies the whole state is required to mourn and a giant parade is always thrown in their honor. And of course the media perpetuates this phenomenon.
So what does this all mean? Will Russia, the United States and China create the largest international “peace keeping” force the world has ever seen in a new breakthrough agreement using the United Nations as the machination to do this? Will international law be recognized globally and enforced by such a force? And is this really a bad thing? I don’t see NATO disbanding to create a re-alliance with their old enemy, nor do I see the European Union or the African Union joining forces to provide security under such a world command. Well not in the very near future, but if this were to happen what we as world citizens should be wary of is the possibility of an authoritarian police state.
World government is not a bad idea in of itself. Human rights, civil rights, environmental rights, animal rights, gay rights and the rights to freedom and individual liberty could all be guaranteed under such a world government. Millions of people across the globe wish for such freedoms and rights and if conducted properly could lead to world peace. But world peace is not the agenda of a military industrial complex which thrives from the riches of war. So what is the overall goal of the military industrial complex or any of the aforementioned entities in creating such a global government?
Personally I do not know, but I think we should start asking. Not all conspiracy theorists are goons and not all of the evidence suggests that the United Nations Security Council is out to achieve world peace. So as individual citizens let us not only question the goals behind a world government, but let us become involved to make a difference. Let us not be so quick to comply with our leader’s demands because of the fear instilled in our heads through the media. Let us not give up the fight because it is too hard and too tiring to continue. Let us not forget our sovereignty as nations, as states, as cities, as communities and neighborhoods, and most importantly, as individuals. In the words of the president of the United States, ‘yes you can.’
Most recent conspiracy theories suggest that 9/11 was planned and produced by the secret organizations which desire to control the world through a global government. I’m not convinced this is true, however I can foresee how such an event could speed up the process of the creation of a mighty international regime.
The new war on terror allowed for the United States to implement policies that not only increased domestic police activity in order to enforce “the laws of the land”, but it also created an indefinite source of military funding for the United States military and other international forces such as NATO. Currently the focus of the war on terror is being placed on Islamic extremists, which for the agenda of creating military cooperation between powerful nations has been quite successful. The United States and NATO are not the only ones active in fighting Islamic extremists. Both China and Russia have had their “problems” with Muslim radicals, and the war on terror is a perfect jump start for cooperation between these powerful countries. And most recently Russia, China and the United States have agreed to take a firm stance against North Korea’s provocative nuclear tests. We must remember that North Korea has helped to deliver nuclear technology and other arms to Islamic extremists across the globe. Piracy in the high seas around Somalia has been another conflict area in which the most powerful countries have come together to fight a common enemy.
Perhaps fighting terrorists, pirates, international crime syndicates and other “bad guys” is not a bad thing, but for the military industrial complex this is the dream they’ve been waiting for. And now that the military industrial complex can receive an indefinite amount of funding to create weapons to fight these “bad guys” they can perpetuate their global influence over political processes which decide who should be dealt with and which laws should be enforced. The war on drugs will inevitably be tied into the war on terror which will provide the police with more power to enforce the streets of the United States and other countries which support this agenda. In New Mexico it is common for the police to shoot and kill suspected gang members with absolutely no recourse. A gang member dies and nobody cares, but when a cop dies the whole state is required to mourn and a giant parade is always thrown in their honor. And of course the media perpetuates this phenomenon.
So what does this all mean? Will Russia, the United States and China create the largest international “peace keeping” force the world has ever seen in a new breakthrough agreement using the United Nations as the machination to do this? Will international law be recognized globally and enforced by such a force? And is this really a bad thing? I don’t see NATO disbanding to create a re-alliance with their old enemy, nor do I see the European Union or the African Union joining forces to provide security under such a world command. Well not in the very near future, but if this were to happen what we as world citizens should be wary of is the possibility of an authoritarian police state.
World government is not a bad idea in of itself. Human rights, civil rights, environmental rights, animal rights, gay rights and the rights to freedom and individual liberty could all be guaranteed under such a world government. Millions of people across the globe wish for such freedoms and rights and if conducted properly could lead to world peace. But world peace is not the agenda of a military industrial complex which thrives from the riches of war. So what is the overall goal of the military industrial complex or any of the aforementioned entities in creating such a global government?
Personally I do not know, but I think we should start asking. Not all conspiracy theorists are goons and not all of the evidence suggests that the United Nations Security Council is out to achieve world peace. So as individual citizens let us not only question the goals behind a world government, but let us become involved to make a difference. Let us not be so quick to comply with our leader’s demands because of the fear instilled in our heads through the media. Let us not give up the fight because it is too hard and too tiring to continue. Let us not forget our sovereignty as nations, as states, as cities, as communities and neighborhoods, and most importantly, as individuals. In the words of the president of the United States, ‘yes you can.’